The case against AI art is becoming more apparent as we delve deeper into the capabilities and limitations of generative AI. No matter how powerful these technologies become, they will never be able to create true art. Renowned writer Ted Chiang, a highly respected science fiction author, is a strong advocate of this view.
Chiang, best known for his novella “Story Of Your Life” (which was adapted into the movie “Arrival”), has also written extensively about the dangers and shortcomings of AI. His articles in The New Yorker provide a deep insight into why the case against AI art is so compelling.
In his recent article, Chiang argues that the potential of large language models (LLMs) remains largely theoretical. So far, generative AI has been most successful at lowering our expectations, both in what we read and in what we write for others. This trend is concerning because it treats us as less than what we are: creators and perceivers of meaning. This is a crucial point in the case against AI art.
Even as LLMs improve, Chiang believes their output will never qualify as true art. He acknowledges that art is notoriously hard to define, but he offers a simple explanation: “Art is something that results from making a lot of choices.” These choices, whether they lead to a great novel, painting, or film, involve a human act of communication between the creator and the audience. This is something AI cannot replicate, reinforcing the case against AI art.
Chiang concludes by emphasizing that while we are all influenced by what has come before us, it is by living our lives and interacting with others that we bring meaning into the world. This is something an auto-complete algorithm can never do, and the case against AI art is clear—AI lacks the human touch that makes art meaningful.
In the ongoing debate over AI’s role in creativity, the case against AI art is a powerful reminder that true creativity cannot be automated. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
Featured images credits: Andriy Onufriyenko / Getty Images
1 thought on “The Case Against AI Art: Why True Creativity Can’t Be Automated”